icon caret-left icon caret-right instagram pinterest linkedin facebook x goodreads bluesky threads tiktok question-circle facebook circle twitter circle linkedin circle instagram circle goodreads circle pinterest circle

Musings

What It Is I Hope to Achieve

I've been writing poetry for over 45 years, and while I had dreamed of publishing a book for at least a couple of decades, I never felt like anything I wrote was good enough. I just didn't have the confidence to show others what I was doing.

 

It wasn't until I found myself so frustrated with wanting a meaningful creative outlet that I decided it was important to see if what I was writing was good enough to publish. I no longer was willing to accept poetry as a hobby. I wanted to sell my books to others.

 

I've now done this, and my first book, In Letting Go, which became available on Amazon.com on October 1st, 2024, while not a hit, is selling and is being reviewed positively. My next book, The Unknown Race, which is slated for release on March 1st, 2025, is an even stronger book, and I think it might find more success.

 

And while I don't expect to find fame or fortune with my books of poetry, what I hope to achieve is some measure of success. Consistent sales, helpful reviews, and a small but appreciative readership. If I can reach these goals, I'll feel like I've accomplished a great deal.

 

But how do I go from selling fifty-three copies of my first book in its first 90 days on the market to consistently selling book after book in sufficient quantities that that slowly, over time, I make some kind of name for myself? I don't know, not yet, but I'm willing to continue writing and publishing, focusing on quality and consistency over trying to make a quick buck.

 

I realize this is going to be a long, hard road, and while I'm not a young man, I hope I have enough good years left in me to find this success, and to die pleased that I was able to share my experiences with others in a form of art that I find satisfying.

Be the first to comment

A Brief History of the Camera

Today, anyone who can afford a smart phone has a nice, small and portable camera available 24 hours a day, but when I was growing up in the 1960s and 70s, they were relatively rare. My older brother had a Minolta single lens reflex (SLR) camera, and I was fortunate enough to own a number of cameras as a child, from a Polaroid to a nice Canon SLR, but most people who couldn't afford a camera were left with much less exciting options.

 
polaroid-camera.png
A Polaroid Camera


With that in mind, I want to provide a brief history on the evolution of the camera, and I'll end this with my own observations.

 

Around 1550, the precursor to the modern camera lens was used as an aid in drawing. Lenses were placed in walls or closed window shutters in darkened rooms, and they would project images that artists could view and draw.

 

By the 1700s, inventors were discovering the chemistry of creating images on paper, but it wasn't until the 1800s that the camera was born. Joseph Nicéphore Niépce is credited as the first person to create a permanent photograph of an image using a camera, and from there, the idea of the camera flourished.

 

George Eastman invented celluloid in 1888, and with it, photographic film. He also created the first camera, which he named Kodak.

 
kodak-camera.png
An Original Kodak Camera

 

35mm camera film was invented in the early 1900s, and by 1913, Oskar Barmack, who worked in R&D at Leitz, invented the Ur-Leica camera.

 

The precursor to the SLR was invented in 1928 by Franke and Heidecke Rolleiflex. It was a medium format twin-lens reflex (TLR) camera.

 

SLRs came on the scene in the 1930s, and instant cameras were invented in the late 1940s. Automatic cameras came into their own in the 1960s, and the first image sensors that would eventually evolve into the modern digital camera were also invented in the 1960s.


canon-f-1-slr.png
A Canon F-1 SLR

 

The first fully digital SLR camera was invented by Sony and debuted in 1981, but the sensors were available long before that date, and had many uses both in commercial and consumer electronics.

 

Phones with built-in cameras came about around 2000, and over the next several years, dramatically decreased in size and expense while increasing in quality.

 

And while you'd think the smartphone era would have dramatically improved the digital camera, the first iPhone did not a great camera. It would take another decade before the smartphone became a suitable replacement for conventional cameras.

 

Modern cellular phones provide a camera in just about everyone's pocket, throughout most of the world. Even the cheapest feature phone has a camera, whereas popular smart phones by Samsung and Apple provide cutting edge sensors, lenses, and sophisticated computers and software to create exceptional images.

 


iphone-14-camera-bump.png
iPhone Cameras

 

Interestingly, photography was often about capturing an accurate image, one that the photographer worked hard to achieve. Lighting was an essential element, with photographers often waiting for the natural light to bath their subject perfectly before snapping a photograph. Or, just as often, they used artificial lighting to get the perfect shot.

 

With today's smartphones, most of us no longer worry about accuracy or lighting. The camera built into the device does the best it can, and the software takes care of the rest. And if we don't like the image, we manipulate with either the software on the camera, or even more sophisticated software on our computers.

 

People often talk about how inaccurate smartphone photography is, but it's always been up to the photographer to decide whether a photograph suitably captures a given scene or person. For some photographers, including myself, the smartphone is close to the perfect camera, but for many others, it comes nowhere close to capturing reality or providing the correct set of tools to do so.

Be the first to comment

What is Love?

Data, an android on the TV show Star Trek: The Next Generation, defined friendship like this:

 

"As I experience certain sensory input patterns, my mental pathways become accustomed to them. The inputs eventually are anticipated and even missed when absent."

 

This is a good definition of friendship, but it's also the definition of love.

 

People are often attracted to each other, not just physically, but through all sorts of different means. For example, one person might strike up a conversation with another and find they have a lot in common, or they find the same types of things to be humorous. This could turn into a relationship, and they could soon find themselves "in love."

 

But is love a thing? Is it some chemical coursing through our veins, or a vapor that snakes through the universe, infecting humans?

 

More likely than not, it's just a word that we assign to our feelings. To those "sensory input patterns" and "mental pathways" we become accustomed to.

 

Even the word "feelings" is a bit odd, like they are something other than thoughts and sensory inputs. Humans are more like the android Data than we wish to believe, because we think, we touch, we hear and we feed all this information into our brains, and it tells us what we feel.

 

Our brains "inform" us that we are now "in love."

 

Not that any of this discounts those feelings. When we have that overwhelming desire to be with someone, to see their face, feel their hand in ours, to hear their voice, and to kiss their lips, it sure feels like love.

 

It feels like the greatest thing to have ever happened to us.

Be the first to comment